Case: Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax vs Sovereign Pharma Pvt Ltd, ITAT Pune
- The Assessing Officer (AO) reopened the assessment four years from the end of the relevant assessment year and issued the notice under u/s 148 of the act.
- During the reassessment, the AO made an addition on account of difference in receipts of sundry debtors.
- The reassessment proceedings are not valid as it is:
- purely on AO’s change of opinion
- to cover up alleged deficiencies in the assessment order
- initiated after reappreciation of material already available with the AO
- The AO cannot invoke the provisions of section 148 or 147 to make additions on mere reappreciation of the facts or negligence if documents are already on record.
Subscribe and get more such updates